war and charity Friday, 28 January 2011

According to a recent article, the Afghan Appeal Fund (AAF) are 'no colonial pet project'. I beg to differ.

AAF is a de facto arm of the British army. The organisation was founded by Caroline Lady Richard, wife of the Chief of the Defence Staff General Sir David Richards, a.k.a. the professional head of the British armed forces. The enterprise is also supported by a host of other high-profile military commanders, not least the infamous and now-retired General Stanley A. McChrystal of the United States Army. For its fundraising efforts, it sells official US and British army top trumps, which teach kids the motto (the ever peaceful 'Death Dealing Eye' in the case of the British 3 Regiment Army Air Corps), firepower, manpower, and combat versatility of the respective fighting units.

The websites suggested reading list instructs you in the benevolent civilizing mission of the West; one book reads, 'Afghanistan's Tragedy: A Problem for the West'. Also included is the bestseller, 'Three Cups of Tea'. As required reading for US commanders and troops in Afghanistan, I was immediately suspicious. Finding a critical book review (which traversed beyond mere complaints of style, plot engagement etc.) took more than a few google searches. Indeed, I almost thought my cynicism to be misplaced, with glowing reviews seeming to emanate from every corner (see Amazon, for instance). After a little more persistency, I managed to find a lengthy review of the book at a now defunct blog. Despite the ever-so predictable title ('Not My Cup of Tea'), the piece confirmed my worst suspicions.

With the back cover proclaiming that he was a “real life Indiana Jones” and the Washington Post dubbing his territory “exotic,” I had a hunch that the book would prove to be a study in Orientalism. I found myself outraged as I read page after page of descriptions of servile natives who, for reasons unknown to me, pledged allegiance to the United States despite living on the other side of the globe. I found abundant depictions of dangerous territories which would offer the Westerner enlightenment and adventure. I found a plethora of depoliticized explanations for ‘terror,’ the main one being a lack of literacy, and at times I even came across blatantly racist and colonial language.

As his project to build schools for neglected and illiterate natives gained momentum, people came to learn of his noble presence. As the book tells us, “the legend of a gentle infidel called Dr. Greg was … growing” (210). One local tells his fellow countrymen that “Christian men have come halfway around the world to show our Muslim children the light of education” (257), swiftly relegating the Muslim world to the illiterate and ignorant, and upholding Christians as the heirs of education and civility...

The historic and well-known connections between Christianity and colonialism are critical in deconstructing Three Cups of Tea. You see, Mortenson is not just a Christlike savior, he is also an imperialist in his own right. We are given image after image of his trek through a dangerous and rugged land, a land open to penetration, ready to be claimed or tamed. Indeed, Mortenson’s simple goal to “leave Christa [his deceased sister]’s necklace at 28,267 feet” is oddly reminiscent of planting a flag in the soil.

Orientalism tells us that the Westerner in the Orient is there to be an expert, to understand the local culture and norms (even better than the locals themselves) and translate them for the West. This is precisely Mortenson’s project, and “going native” is just one of the many habits he develops. Speaking of his childhood abroad, we learn that Greg swam “happily in a sea of cultures and languages” (36). The multitudinous cultures are there for Greg to absorb; the world offers itself to him unselfishly, and Greg accepts it.

Mortenson’s samplings of local culture are most striking when he asks the natives for instructions on how to pray (62), dresses as a local and asks whether he looks Pakistani (71), and decides he must worship “in the sunni way in this sunni land” (168). Almost comical was Mortenson’s appropriation of local names for his children: his daughter, named Amira, and son, named Khyber, suggest that Mortenson has found a cultural richness in the land that was ready to be borrowed and imported into his own life.
The parallels between Greg and AAF are self-evident. "You can drop bombs, hand out condoms, build roads or put in electricity, but unless the girls are educated, a society won't change," is supposedly a favourite quote of the Three Cups of Tea author. This is the epitome of the Victorian African civilizing mission with a twenty-first century tinge. This is the 'war on terror'.

lady gaga and sexualisation Wednesday, 26 January 2011

Today it has been reported/rumoured/(fabricated) that lady gaga's new perfume will "smell of blood and semen". Shocking? Only 'mildly' according to the fashionista website. Apparently someone called Rad Hourani has beaten her to it. Yet behind this banal and laughable gossip is something more sinister: the pervasive pornification of western culture. John Whitehead has in fact already written a fantastic article on this exact subject over at the Huffington Post, explaining how lady gaga is one of many artists contributing to the sexualisation of young children through pop music and videos.

All of this of course goes far beyond music videos; it is rather just one small part of a closely choreographed image which not only appears to show a genuine motherly love and concern for her fans, but projects a deeply and persistently sexualized image, which is almost impossible to evade. I expected my search for an ideal sexualized image to take at least a minute, but I was obviously a little naive. In fact, I managed to strike gold with the splash page of her own website, which shows an picture of her wearing a leather jacket and turned away from the viewer. She is also sporting her fashionable 'pantsless' look, although this time in the British rather than American sense of the word. In this light, the reported 'blood and semen' scent fits neatly into lady gaga's existing image; this is clearly not some perverse and shocking aberration. The ever-useful twitter seems to support this further. Despite the occasionally bewildered '???' and satirical statement, the vast majority tweeted the news uncommented as if it were simply another middle-of-the-road gossip story.

The rumoured fragrance is also a illuminating example of the progressively pervasive normalisation of pornography in our culture, and the internalisation of the messages and sexual acts that it depicts. Because in pornography, semen is not just merely a reproductive fluid, but an explicitly visual symbol that is projected onto the subservient woman's face or body, who, of course, is portrayed as loving every second of it. Researchers such as Gail Porter have shown how this sexual act has translated and proliferated into reality through the direct influence of pornography, with surveys indicating its increasing perception as a perfectly acceptable and standard sexual act. I hesitate to be more explicit or go into much further detail myself, but an interview with Porter, founder of Stop Porn Culture and the recent book PornLand: How Porn Has Hijacked Our Sexuality, over at New Left Project is probably a good place to start. So there you have it. Lady gaga, sexualisation, pornography, and mainstream western culture. Now that's something you won't often read in the Guardian.